About Me

Name:jwinkles
Email: mwinkles@farmerstel.com
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Search

Blog Roll

 

Guns and Rape

The losers at MSNBC are on the attack. Olberloon and Dan Abrams (too insignificant for a nickname) have their claws out and pointed in the direction of the great Supreme Court Justice, Antonin Scalia. The two butt-sniffers are angry because Scalia had the nerve to vote in favor of upholding the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution. You know, the one allowing Americans to own guns. The court voted to overturn a 32-year old ban on handguns in Washington D.C. (gee that worked out well for the citizens of D.C., which, according to the FBI ranks as one of the most dangerous cities in the United States and maintains one of the highest per-capita murder rates in the country while having this ban). 

I wonder where the outrage was yesterday when this very same court voted 5-4 (same number as today with only one Justice changing sides) to not allow the death penalty to be used on a 300 pound monkey coward who was convicted of violently raping an eight year old girl. I guess that doesn’t fit MSNBC’s left wing, Marxist agenda. It’s far more important to leave Americans unprotected from criminals and the government than to stand up for what is right. As far as I’m concerned, those two leftist nut sacks can share a cell with the 300lb pile of monkey dung. I wonder how much they will like having him tear into their backsides. My feeling is that at least Olberqueer would probably enjoy it. I hope the three of them are able to experience the same pain and anguish as this poor little girl. The Supreme Court should be ashamed of itself. The five Justices who have allowed this animal to take another breath should be removed from their positions and forced to explain their idiocy to the girl’s parents. Then, they should also have to experience what the eight year old had to. 

You guys all suck. Go find a hole in the earth and deliver us from your BS.     

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Gas

The ignorant and ill-informed will be voting in mass quantities this fall. Many of the thinking Americans will have their votes canceled out by stupid people whose only concern is the price of a gallon of gas. I guess their argument goes something like this: Gas prices are high; George Bush is President; he is a Republican; I will vote Democrat. This is what I call a non-thinking American. For those of you who think that Barack Obama will solve our gas price problem, tell me what he will do. Do you think this because of his vast experience in the oil and gas industry? He has none. Do you think he will help by raising taxes on the oil companies? This makes prices go up. Maybe you think that HOPE will bring prices down. Wow, what logic. 

I understand that many people think that the oil companies need to be punished for making money, but what you don’t realize is that higher taxes will cause them to raise prices. HELLO! Put your emotion away for a minute and use your head for something other than a can crusher. 

By the way, since when did making money become the ultimate sin in America? Why don’t we have the same outrage over the unbelievable amount of money the government steals from us? We lose more money to government than any oil company ever dreamed of getting form us.

Hey people, quit whining. Suck it up and stop relying on government to every single problem in your life. If you’re having financial problems because of the price of gas, go make more money. Get a grip.  

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Lost Perspective

The Democrat Party has officially nominated Barack Obama as their candidate for President of the United States. Yes, a man who very few people had ever heard of only three years ago and know little about even today is a finalist for the most powerful job in the world. A Marxist, community activist, street agitator has won over the formerly great Democrat party because of his uncanny ability to read a teleprompter. How sad. When did this nation become a collection of drones? 

Most people in this nation would never vote for a candidate who described himself as a socialist, yet, after an examination of the platforms of the Socialist party and Barack Obama, very little difference is found. I am no longer concerned with my disagreement with John McCain over single issues. There is an overriding issue: liberty. The enemy of liberty is government. The election of Obama would bring massive increases in the size of government. This leaves me without the luxury of choosing a President. My choice is that of liberty or tyranny.

We must look beyond the empty promises of a demagogue and realize the greater struggle. History tells us that it is not natural for the human experience to exist with the kind of liberty that has blessed this country. Wars have been fought and lives have been lost to throw off the shackles of government oppression. Today, we seem willing to accept the iron fist of government because gas prices are high. Americans have lost perspective. Perhaps I am in the minority now in my assertion that we are not better off red than dead. 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Intent on Destruction

As cynical as it may sound, I think there are certain politicians from a particular political party who want the price of fuel to be high. The Democrat Party has but one goal this November: to win the White House. What better way to achieve such a goal than to implement as much economic suffering on the American people as politically feasible between now and the November elections. Most Americans associate economic well-being, whether good or bad, with the President of the United States with Congress often escaping blame or receiving credit. Because of this mindset, President Bush will be associated with our economic suffering in spite of the fact that many of the problems with our economy are directly related to economic policy pushed by Congress. 

If I’m wrong then what is the explanation for the overwhelming number of Democrats voting over and over again against legislation such as; coal to liquid technology (78% of House Dems voted against), oil shale exploration (86% of House Dems voted against), outer continental shelf exploration (83% of House Dems voted against), and increased refining capacity (96% of House Dems voted against). Most Americans believe politicians are the most corrupt group of people around. We all agree most politicians will do whatever necessary to be elected. It is my contention that we are experiencing the “whatever necessary” part right now with the economic policies being pursued by Congress. These people are so consumed with the lust for power they are willing to destroy our economy. 

Of course, by accepting my assertion, one must suspend the idea that may also be the case. Perhaps the Democrat Party has gone so far left it really sees America as evil. Maybe the Democrat Party no longer exists and in its place has risen a Marxist faction intent on destroying this great nation. Do they view this country as one that uses all the world’s resources and gives nothing in return? Do they think America needs to be punished?

These ideas may sound loony but I’m not implementing economic policy. At least my lunacy only affects me. Meanwhile insanity reigns supreme on Capitol Hill and believe me, everything those losers do affects all of us. They wouldn’t have it any other way.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Frauds and Liars

I want to take a few minutes to applaud our extremely hard-working elected officials for their tireless effort on Capitol Hill on Wednesday. They held yet another grilling of the oil company executives blasting them for running successful businesses. That’s basically what our government has come to. I defy anyone to find a quote by some representative in Washington which praises any industry or business. They attack the private sector relentlessly. They use propaganda and fear tactics to turn all of us against the private sector. Many of us take the bait in spite of the fact that our livelihood is found there. 

I had no idea that the members of the House and Senate were experts in the oil industry. I guess I should have known since they are experts on everything else. It wouldn’t be so frustrating to watch if these pompous Senators weren’t so closed-minded and block-headed. They refuse to actually hear what the witnesses say at the hearing. If they would quit flapping their jaws for just a minute and listen, perhaps solutions could be found. Instead they would rather grandstand and propagate.

According Stephen Simon, Senior VP of Exxon Mobil, his company makes 4 cents profit on every gallon of gas sold. So, how does that huge profit margin correlate to the price of a gallon of gas? He also said that this number is down from the massive 10 cents per gallon profits recorded last year at this time. Wow, they are some real modern day Robber Barons aren’t they.     

Since our government won’t allow new drilling for oil or building of new refineries, I have a suggestion that might help increase supply. Oil privileges should be revoked for all those states who hate the oil industry. Wisconsin, New York, Vermont, Massachusetts, and California are all states whose Senators have blasted away at this industry so let them do without. They need to be punished until they elect sensible people to office. 

The idea that the most wasteful, corrupt, and inefficient entity known to man would criticize private citizens for having the gall to turn a profit seems ridiculous to me. However, our Senate seems to think that bringing in the oil executives every couple of months to yell at them will bring gas prices down. It’s no wonder this group of Senators and Congressmen only claim to fame in the end will be having the lowest approval ratings of all time.  

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Loser

Olbermann continues to attack President Bush for supposedly attacking Barry Obama while giving a speech in Israel. He now claims that Bush is backing off of his “appeasement” comments by stating that those comments were not directed at Barry. Hey Keith, Obama’s name was never mentioned in the speech. Why do you assume that Barry was the target of the speech?

During this same episode Keith wants to know why when he referred to our troops as “cold-blooded killers who will kill people to achieve (the Bush administration’s) political objectives” the right assumed he was talking about the troops. I mean, my goodness, he never even said the word “troops”. Obviously this a glaring example of hypocrisy but since when did Olbermoron become fair or professional? He is little more than a two-bit hack with minimal ratings. Not to mention a schizophrenic, small-balled, hate-monger. He went so far as to claim that the “lunatic fringe”, that’s to say regular Americans like Mark Levin and Laura Ingram hat the troops. This guy has literally lost his mind. It’s just too bad that only a handful of people witness his demise on a given night. 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What the?

Oil company executives were grilled on Capitol Hill Tuesday about the huge amount of profits reported in 2007. While making the oil companies out to be evil for their “excessive” (whatever that means) profit margins, turns out, government’s answer for lowering prices at the gas pump is to increase its own profit margin. Yes, after lambasting the oil company executives for having the gall to actually turn a profit, the government decides that it should be making more money off the oil companies. In spite of having done nothing to help in production of oil and gas, the government thinks that it has a right to take more money out of the pockets of those who are actually productive members of society. It is a shame that we have so many economic illiterates lurching through the halls of congress. 

Keep in mind, congress isn’t upset about the price of gas. Congress is upset at the fact that their grimy hands haven’t been in the pockets of the oil companies any more than what they have. Here we have a bunch of clowns, most of which have never had a real job, who think they know better how to run the oil industry than those who have done it for decades. Rep. Edward Markey, a highly unintelligent miscreant, called on the oil companies to give up the $18 billion in tax cuts referring to them as “billions of federal subsidies”. In other words, any earned dollar escaping the claws of government is now a subsidy. This is their mindset. 

I know it is unpopular to defend oil companies, but all the gnashing of teeth by congress and the media gets a little tiring. It gets old hearing day after day how awful everything is in this nation. These people won’t be happy until Americans start throwing themselves off buildings.  

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Congress Sucks

Once again our highly intelligent group of lawyers in the House of Representatives have proved themselves worthy of the title “Monkey Clowns”. The House on Wednesday voted to repeal $18 billion in tax breaks for big oil companies according to Reuters news service. In other words, their ingenious plan for helping out Americans at the gas pump is to raise taxes on the companies which supply gas. In the words of Speaker Nancy Pelosi, “Gasoline at the pump has gone up 75 cents, 75 cents since we first took up this legislation; imagine what that means to household income.” 

Yes, Ms. Pelosi, imagine. I am trying to imagine why you find it clever to raise taxes on the American people. Perhaps your economic knowledge is limited. Don’t you realize that raising taxes on what you call “big oil” will cause the price of fuel to go up? When you try to punish corporations for making “windfall profits” by raising their taxes, you are only punishing the American people. Also, if your theory of increased taxes on “big oil” helps us at the pump, why don’t you just take all of the oil profits?  Better yet, you should outlaw profits altogether in every industry. Then we can rely solely on government for all our needs. This will eliminate all income classes in our society. We can all wear bamboo hats and gather rice together. Maybe, if we’re really good, Ms. Pelosi will let us have a slice of bologna with our bread and water.

Why can’t the answer ever be less taxation? Who knows, maybe if the oppressive tax on fuel was reduced, prices would fall. Then again, I am just one of the stupid worker drones so what the heck do I know. Nancy Pelosi and the rest of the miscreants in Congress are obviously experts in every industry in the United States. If we, the peasants would just let them take control, this would be a better world. Yeah, well KISS OFF!         
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Kudos for McCain

I give major kudos to John McCain today. Nobody knows how to unify conservatives quite like the great maverick. He is offended by the fact that the wonderful Bill Cunningham (affectionately known to his listeners as Willie) actually had the nerve to make anti-Obama comments at a political function. That’s right, Willie made political speech denouncing the opponent of John McCain who promptly denounced Willie. The highly insensitive, Bill Cunningham, even had the gall to call Obama by his real name: Barack Hussein Obama. What a scurrilous human being this “Willie” is. By the way, he was introducing McCain at a McCain rally! 

So, John McCain is the unifier?

This is why we, as conservatives, are having such a difficult time dealing with the fact that McCain is our only option. You are quick to disparage conservatives and even quicker to defend our political enemies. Can Barry Obama not defend himself? Hey Barry, welcome to the big leagues. We don’t pussyfoot around in the majors. If you can’t handle it then GET LOST!

Hey John, thanks for attacking one of the good guys. We learn more and more where your loyalties lie every time an incident like this takes place. Bite Me!

Tags: mccain  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Froomkin

Here is a copy of an email I sent to Dan Froomkin of the Washington Post after witnessing his deplorable performance on Olbermoron’s stupid little show tonight.

I just saw you on the Left-Wing Comedy Hour with Keith Olbermoron. While I was paying but scant attention, I thought I heard you say something to the effect of you being surprised at the use of fear by government officials to advance some sort of cause or a piece of legislation. Obviously you were referring to Republicans in their fervent appeal to get the FISA bill renewed. My question to you is have you not been listening to liberals and democrats all your life? They have perfected the politics of fear. Of course, they have also perfected the politics of hate America because everything it does is wrong or evil. Certainly a journalist who possesses such grand education credentials as you could notice these things. Then again, actually reporting on these tactics used by liberals would require journalistic integrity which no one in America has any expectation of experiencing any time soon.

I fully expect to hear absolutely nothing in terms of a reply since all mainstream media are spineless egomaniacs. Most are also mentally unstable but that has no relevance on my receiving a reply. If I do happen to get a response, I will certainly post it.

Tags: Media  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Cestpool

The very country which liberals seem so intent on destroying is the one they want to rule.  They talk about the United States as if it were a cestpool.  Well, the United States is you and me.  We are the cestpool.  In their eyes, we need them in order to finally be cleansed.  After all, Obama is a savior, right. 
So after degrading the citizens of this country day after day and night after night, they demand that we cast our ballots in their favor.  For those who do not, the punishment includes being called a racist, sexist, bigot, or homophobe.  Not to mention, redneck, angry white man, dittohead, uneducated, and narrowminded.   
I think that an argument can be made that liberalism, in spite of the fact that it is a failed philosophy, had good intentions.  The liberals from 50 or more years ago at least cared about the country.  Today's version of liberalism however, is void of good intentions.  Today, liberalism has but one purpose; destruction.  It seeks to tear down the pillars of strength which elevate this country above all others.  Why?    
Tags: Liberalism  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

McCain had an Affair?

Let’s just say that the New York Times story http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/21/us/politics/21mccain.html?_r=3&hp=&oref=slogin&pagewanted=print&oref=slogin about John McCain having a “romantic relationship” with a female lobbyist is true. Why is it just now being released by the New York Times? According to Richard Wolfe of Newsweek, this so-called scandal has been the talk of the town in Washington for weeks if not months. Only now that McCain has all but won the Republican nomination, this crummy little propaganda machine decides to destroy him. Keep in mind also that in spite of having known of this possible ethics violation that is, being romantically involved with a lobbyist, the New York Times endorsed him anyway. Yeah, that’s right, so what is that all about? Does the New York Times endorse corruption? Of course they do, they must because they themselves are corrupt. I have no idea if this crap is true or not but one thing I know is true: I trust the New York Times about as much as I like having teeth pulled. 

For the record, McCain and the lobbyist in question have flatly denied the allegations by the propaganda machine. So, who do we believe? I can’t get passed the fact and it can’t be stressed enough that the New York Times knew of this story months ago and still endorsed him. What the? It makes no sense. I think this is an indictment on the media. They are trying to pick the next President of the United States. They manipulate the news to suite their agenda and destroy those who oppose their agenda. Screw them. 

Of course Olbermoron is having a field day with this. His pants are all wet.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Listen to What They Say

So, Obama plagiarized a speech and I am supposed to be outraged, eh? Well, to be honest with you, I DON’T GIVE A CRAP! Are the libs not all saying the same thing all the time? Maybe if people would worry more about what these power hungry psychotics are saying instead of the fact that their words are not original, we might be able to stave off socialism and the danger of becoming France. Honestly, if you had no pride in your country, you would have to use the words of others to fake everybody out too. 

Seriously, is it not true that all these maniacs are stealing their material straight from the pages of the Communist Manifesto? Who cares where they get their words, pay attention to what those words are. We are in grave danger of having the dreams of our forefathers dashed. We must stop letting the media dictate the direction of political discourse and force true debate. Not debate about whether John McCain will make a better President than the Stalinists, but a debate about the principles of liberty, personal freedom, responsibility, role of government, spread of democracy so on and so forth. 

These should always be the issues of debate but especially now. Our country is drifting further and further from its founding principles without so much of a peep of discontent from the masses. Many are ignorant of history and politics, and silly discussions about speech stealing only keep them ignorant.

By the way, I have ALWAYS been proud of America
Tags: Politics  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Enablers of Terrorism

After having the weekend to think about this whole FISA thing, I am afraid that cynicism has taken over my train of thought.  Is it possible that liberals have come to hate George W. Bush so much that they are willing to put the security of this nation on the line just to oppose him?  Is it possible that liberals hate George W. Bush so much that they privately long for another terrorist attack on our nation in order to destroy him politically?  Is it possible that liberals hate George W. Bush that they are willing to align themselves with evil? 

To be honest, I don’t care about the motivation.  Liberals are now enablers of terrorism.  They have placed themselves in the same corner of the ring with the evildoers of this generation. 

It is true, I am cynical.  I am disgusted by the sight of these slimy worms in the media and in government.  I believe they don’t care at all about the welfare of this country, only the welfare of their power.  Leaders?!!  Absolutely not!  They are losers. 

The same group of people (liberals) who preach against racism, sexism, war, hatred, and division of America, survive by perpetuating these very issues.  They need these issues in order to have a platform.  So, call me cynic if you must, one thing I know is truth.  Truth has a tendency to create cynics.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama's Hope

If you listen to the crap spewing out of Barack Obama's mouth you hear him preaching about the importance of hope as if somehow he is the answer to all of our hopes. First of all, the day my hope is found in any politician is the day I can be labeled as hopeless. But that is a different discussion and not the focus of today's lesson. I want to know; what is this hope about which Obama speaks?
Is it, Mr. Obama the hope of millions of aborted dead babies, the hope of defeat in Iraq to use for political amunition, the hope of another terrorist attack in order to further your political career, or the hope of a gun free America so that only the bad guys have them? Is it the hope of a health care system which promises to rid us of the best doctors in the world for the sake of socialism, the hope of turning our national security over to the global community so they will like us, or the hope of taxing my employer into the stone ages causing me to lose my job? Is it the hope of keeping the poor at the bottom of income classes in order to keep them reliant on you, the hope of denying true choice when it comes to deciding where our children attend school, or the hope of an infinite amount of illegal aliens streaming across our borders, watering down the importance of law and order?
From all I gather, this is your promise of hope. So, while everyone tells me that I should be inspired by your "hope" rhetoric, pardon me for not feeling tingles running up and down my leg (ala Chris Matthews). Pardon me for not wanting my country's values shredded to pieces. And although many may see you as a messiah, pardon me, Mr. Obama, for not worshipping at your feet or for that matter and most importantly, not voting for you.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12Next »