Let’s just say that the New York Times story http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/21/us/politics/21mccain.html?_r=3&hp=&oref=slogin&pagewanted=print&oref=slogin about John McCain having a “romantic relationship” with a female lobbyist is true. Why is it just now being released by the New York Times? According to Richard Wolfe of Newsweek, this so-called scandal has been the talk of the town in Washington for weeks if not months. Only now that McCain has all but won the Republican nomination, this crummy little propaganda machine decides to destroy him. Keep in mind also that in spite of having known of this possible ethics violation that is, being romantically involved with a lobbyist, the New York Times endorsed him anyway. Yeah, that’s right, so what is that all about? Does the New York Times endorse corruption? Of course they do, they must because they themselves are corrupt. I have no idea if this crap is true or not but one thing I know is true: I trust the New York Times about as much as I like having teeth pulled. 

For the record, McCain and the lobbyist in question have flatly denied the allegations by the propaganda machine. So, who do we believe? I can’t get passed the fact and it can’t be stressed enough that the New York Times knew of this story months ago and still endorsed him. What the? It makes no sense. I think this is an indictment on the media. They are trying to pick the next President of the United States. They manipulate the news to suite their agenda and destroy those who oppose their agenda. Screw them. 

Of course Olbermoron is having a field day with this. His pants are all wet.

So, Obama plagiarized a speech and I am supposed to be outraged, eh? Well, to be honest with you, I DON’T GIVE A CRAP! Are the libs not all saying the same thing all the time? Maybe if people would worry more about what these power hungry psychotics are saying instead of the fact that their words are not original, we might be able to stave off socialism and the danger of becoming France. Honestly, if you had no pride in your country, you would have to use the words of others to fake everybody out too. 

Seriously, is it not true that all these maniacs are stealing their material straight from the pages of the Communist Manifesto? Who cares where they get their words, pay attention to what those words are. We are in grave danger of having the dreams of our forefathers dashed. We must stop letting the media dictate the direction of political discourse and force true debate. Not debate about whether John McCain will make a better President than the Stalinists, but a debate about the principles of liberty, personal freedom, responsibility, role of government, spread of democracy so on and so forth. 

These should always be the issues of debate but especially now. Our country is drifting further and further from its founding principles without so much of a peep of discontent from the masses. Many are ignorant of history and politics, and silly discussions about speech stealing only keep them ignorant.

By the way, I have ALWAYS been proud of America

After having the weekend to think about this whole FISA thing, I am afraid that cynicism has taken over my train of thought.  Is it possible that liberals have come to hate George W. Bush so much that they are willing to put the security of this nation on the line just to oppose him?  Is it possible that liberals hate George W. Bush so much that they privately long for another terrorist attack on our nation in order to destroy him politically?  Is it possible that liberals hate George W. Bush that they are willing to align themselves with evil? 

To be honest, I don’t care about the motivation.  Liberals are now enablers of terrorism.  They have placed themselves in the same corner of the ring with the evildoers of this generation. 

It is true, I am cynical.  I am disgusted by the sight of these slimy worms in the media and in government.  I believe they don’t care at all about the welfare of this country, only the welfare of their power.  Leaders?!!  Absolutely not!  They are losers. 

The same group of people (liberals) who preach against racism, sexism, war, hatred, and division of America, survive by perpetuating these very issues.  They need these issues in order to have a platform.  So, call me cynic if you must, one thing I know is truth.  Truth has a tendency to create cynics.

If you listen to the crap spewing out of Barack Obama's mouth you hear him preaching about the importance of hope as if somehow he is the answer to all of our hopes. First of all, the day my hope is found in any politician is the day I can be labeled as hopeless. But that is a different discussion and not the focus of today's lesson. I want to know; what is this hope about which Obama speaks?
Is it, Mr. Obama the hope of millions of aborted dead babies, the hope of defeat in Iraq to use for political amunition, the hope of another terrorist attack in order to further your political career, or the hope of a gun free America so that only the bad guys have them? Is it the hope of a health care system which promises to rid us of the best doctors in the world for the sake of socialism, the hope of turning our national security over to the global community so they will like us, or the hope of taxing my employer into the stone ages causing me to lose my job? Is it the hope of keeping the poor at the bottom of income classes in order to keep them reliant on you, the hope of denying true choice when it comes to deciding where our children attend school, or the hope of an infinite amount of illegal aliens streaming across our borders, watering down the importance of law and order?
From all I gather, this is your promise of hope. So, while everyone tells me that I should be inspired by your "hope" rhetoric, pardon me for not feeling tingles running up and down my leg (ala Chris Matthews). Pardon me for not wanting my country's values shredded to pieces. And although many may see you as a messiah, pardon me, Mr. Obama, for not worshipping at your feet or for that matter and most importantly, not voting for you.

Olbermaggott said yesterday that the Bush administration was using fear to persuade Congress to renew the vital legislation known as FISA (foreign intelligence surveilance act). Bush said that somewhere in the world right now terrorists are planning more terror attacks that pale in comparison to 9/11.
Hey maggott, do you deny this? Do you believe this not to be true? You know, this shows maggot's incredible incomeptence as a reporter. I can assure you Olby, that nobody wants to tap your telephone. God only knows what kind of disgusting things happen on your phone lines and by the way, you are not an important person. You are so irrelevant that only a rare few get outraged by your idiocy. In other words, your ratings suck.
Speaking of hipocracy, is it not true that you and all your lib buddies constantly use fear in order to push your global warming agenda. Anybody who dares to challenge the propoganda is called a denier. Well, I guess that makes you a denier of terrorism. Wow, you have to be highly unintelligent to make comments which place you in a category such as this. Hey maggott, find some new material. As your ratings suggest, your act is getting old. It is tiresome to have to comment on somebody with such low intelligence and humor. Give me a challenge. Dork.

So the party which claims to want to change the way Washington works is preparing to disenfranchise its own voters. Superdelegates will, in all likelihood, determine the democrat nominee for President. Thats right, all you libs who braved the elements, took time out of your busy schedules, and did your civil duty by voting, will have your votes thrown in the garbage if it comes down to the superdelegates. The superdelegates are current or former elected officeholders and party officials (wikipedia). In other words, political insiders. More than likely this situation will occur if Barry Obama has a slight delegate lead going into the democrat convention. Most believe that a majority of superdelegates will vote for Billary. If somehow there is enough to overcome Barry's lead, she would be the nominee. The party that trumpets itself as the party of change, the party that stands up for the little guy, is going flip the little guy off and tell him get lost. You must understand, in the eyes of the elites, the little guy is stupid. We don't know what is best for us, only they know what is best for us. And so it is, after all the outrage of the supposed disenfranchisement of voters in the 2000 election, those same bunch of losers are going to thwart the will of its own people. Why? Because they know better. In my opinion you are all morons. Kiss off!